After 11 months of treatment, gastroscopy showed that the lesions of gastric tumors disappeared. At present, 14 months since the initial treatment, there is no clinical evidence of disease progression, and the current overall survival time is 14 months. Moreover, the quality of life of the patient was good and there were no obvious adverse drug reactions. This suggests that immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy has a synergistic effect on tumor and can play a better anti-tumor effect.Since its initial approval by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014, the indications for the use of the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has increased. However, to date, there has no report on immune myocarditis caused by the ICI sintilimab. In addition, there has been no literature review on ICI-induced myocarditis in lung cancer patients. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/imd-0354.html This is a case report of an elderly male patient who presented with a productive cough and progressive dysphagia for 3 days. The symptoms started on day 6 after the third cycle of sintilimab treatment for his lung carcinoma. In accordance with his clinical manifestations of progressive dysphagia, a previous history of lung cancer, abnormal electrocardiograph, significantly increased serum myocardial enzyme levels, and normal coronary angiography results, sintilimab-induced myocarditis was diagnosed. Methylprednisolone (80-40 mg) was used to inhibit the immune injury and the patient was safely discharged on the 13th day following admission. Since ICI-induced myocarditis is rare and fatal, we summarized the characteristics of 20 cases of the disease in lung cancer patients to highlight to oncologists, respiratory experts, and cardiologists the serious side effects of the drug when they encounter lung cancer patients using ICIs. Like most ICIs, sintilimab induces severe immune myocarditis and requires corticosteroids therapy, and this should be recognized by doctors in multiple departments.Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare and highly malignant mesenchymal tumor that primarily affects adolescents and young adults. ASPS is characterized by a slow growth rate, high metastatic potential, and resistance to conventional therapies. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of advanced malignancies, improving the objective response rate (ORR) and prolonging patient survival. The combination of immunotherapy with targeted therapies can overcome resistance to treatment with ICIs alone. Although substantial progress has been made in various solid tumors, the clinical relevance of ICIs, used alone or in combination with other therapies, in patients with ASPS remains unclear. This is a case report of a 32-year-old man who was diagnosed with advanced ASPS. After 8 months of anlotinib treatment, the patient's disease progressed and new cerebellar metastases were detected. Radiotherapy was administered in addition to camrelizumab combined with apatinib to treat the brain metastases. The patient achieved partial remission (46%) after 3 months of treatment and did not present any severe side effects. This is the first reported case of the successful treatment of advanced ASPS with camrelizumab combined with apatinib. This case supports the use of a novel treatment regimen for patients with inoperable ASPS or ASPS that is resistant to conventional therapies.There is currently no standard treatment for multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC). We report a case of synchronous MPLC presenting as one ground-glass opacity (GGO) with predominant consolidation accompanied by at least parietal pleura involvement, and another with &gt;30 GGOs distributed across bilateral lungs, which was ineligible for complete resection. CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of the nearly pure-solid mass showed invasive lung adenocarcinoma mainly composed of acinar type. Capture-based, ultra-deep targeted sequencing (Burning Rock, Guangzhou, China) was performed on the tumor tissue biopsy. The result revealed no druggable mutations according to the guideline and a high TMB of 34.1 Mb. Immunohistochemical staining (22C3; Dako, Denmark) was positive for PD-L1 expression with a tumor expression level of 30%. Based on the clinical information and patient's decision, he received 3 cycles of pemetrexed plus pembrolizumab and was subsequently forced to withdraw due to acquired immune-related pneumonitis. After discontinuation of corticosteroids, he was subjected to wedge resection for the nearly pure-solid lesion, and then refused further treatment for the other tumors. After a follow-up of 12 months from termination of immunotherapy, almost all GGOs achieved radiographically complete remission, attributed to the tailing effect of the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) antibody of pembrolizumab. Through the case study we found that unresectable synchronous MPLC presenting as GGOs may respond well to immunotherapy.Coronary artery fistula (CAF) is a rare condition, whilst lung cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. We came cross an interesting case with both diseases. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report pertaining to a patient with a coexisting CAF and lung adenocarcinoma. The patient was a 67-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital for evaluation of persistent cough. Through the examination she was diagnosed coronary artery fistula and lung adenocarcinoma. Both diseases were successfully treated in a single operation (artery ligation and pulmonary lobectomy). The post-operative period was uneventful. At 3-month follow-up, there were no signs of blood shunting or cancer recurrence. There is no standard guidelines to treat both diseases. We want to seek out a solution to the problem. In this patient, we successfully performed artery ligation and pulmonary lobectomy in a single operation without any complications. We believe the treatment of patients with CAFs should be individualized. But, there is still a lot of shortcomings in our research. First of all, we have no enough cases to support our approach. What's more, the long-term effects of the operation are not certain. Last but not least, we have no proof in genetics with both diseases.